For AI agents: a documentation index is available at the root level at /llms.txt and /llms-full.txt. Append /llms.txt to any URL for a page-level index, or .md for the markdown version of any page.
PlaygroundDiscordStatusDashboardSign Up >
DocumentationSDK ReferenceGraphiti
DocumentationSDK ReferenceGraphiti
      • Key Concepts
      • Architecture Patterns
      • What is Context Engineering?
      • Retrieval Philosophy
        • Graph Overview
        • Zep vs Graph RAG
LogoLogo
PlaygroundDiscordStatusDashboardSign Up >
Key ConceptsGraph Concepts

Zep vs Graph RAG

How Zep compares to traditional GraphRAG approaches
Was this page helpful?
Previous

Quick Start Guide

Integrate Zep into your AI application in minutes
Next
Built with

While traditional GraphRAG excels at static document summarization, Zep is designed for dynamic and frequently updated datasets with continuous data updates, temporal fact tracking, and sub-200ms query latency. This makes Zep particularly suitable for providing an agent with up-to-date knowledge about an object/system or user.

GraphRAG builds a static knowledge structure through batch processing and answers queries by summarizing entity clusters with an LLM. That design fits document corpora that rarely change. Zep instead constructs a Context Graph that updates incrementally as new data arrives, tracks when each fact becomes valid or invalid using bi-temporal modeling, and retrieves with combined semantic, keyword, and graph search rather than sequential LLM summarization. The result is up-to-date context returned with sub-200ms retrieval latency, even as the underlying data continues to change.

The table below summarizes how the two approaches differ across data handling, retrieval, temporal modeling, and scalability.

AspectGraphRAGZep
Primary UseStatic document summarizationDynamic data management
Data HandlingBatch-oriented processingContinuous, incremental updates
Knowledge StructureEntity clusters & community summariesEpisodic data, semantic entities, communities
Retrieval MethodSequential LLM summarizationHybrid semantic, keyword, and graph-based search
AdaptabilityLowHigh
Temporal HandlingBasic timestamp trackingExplicit bi-temporal tracking
Contradiction HandlingLLM-driven summarization judgmentsTemporal edge invalidation
Query LatencySeconds to tens of secondsSub-200ms retrieval latency
Custom Entity TypesNoYes, customizable
ScalabilityModerateHigh, optimized for large datasets